Deep Web – Still Afraid To Visit?

Internet News – When we discuss about the deep web, imagine the various things horrible. Whether it’s with creepy pictures and full of unlawful things, or even full of dangerous masked people who are ready to get into your network system at any moment. Not only that, accessing the deep web also seems very difficult and need a special ability to be able to really use it. That is right?
Not really. Because there are actually some wrong facts about that, which may make many people reluctant and afraid to access them. Included also for you. When in fact not so.

deep web wiki
Below, there are 5 wrong facts about deep website hopefully knowing it, making you no longer afraid to visit and explore other parts of the internet.

1. is a horrible internet part

The first fact that is wrong about the deep website. Deep website is not really a horrible part of the internet. Perhaps when you mean terrible is the number of illegal images, creepy videos and a variety of unimaginable things, is not actually in the deep website. These creepy things are on the dark web, which is the place of many of the horror things.

Deep website is a site and also even social media that is not included in index search engine. Like for example on Google and so forth. On the inside of this internet, you can find many interesting things that are not always scary.

2.  is full of illegal stuff

Just like the explanation on the first number, deep website is not really a place for horror or illegal things. In contrast, deep website is an ordinary place like the surface of the internet that we usually use. It’s just that all sites in the deep website is not indexed on Google. And how to access them differently.

And actually the same as on the internet that you use today, there are indeed some things that are illegal in the deep website. But the capacity and the amount is almost the same as the illegal thing you can find on the surface internet. So do not be afraid of the illegal things in the deep website this later.

3. Going to the deep website can be the target of hackers

Aware not, that let alone in the deep website, on the surface web alias internet you are using now you are also in the target of hackers. Even your movements are also monitored by specialized organizations to showcase what you are looking for as well as habits when using the internet. So not much different from the deep site.

It’s just in the case, you should be more careful because the trap can be anything. Even the thing that it feels normal is actually a RAT virus waiting to gain access to the computer system you are using.

4.  a lot of viruses

Similarly dnegan on the surface web, this virus is always there. This is why, anti-virus is the most unforgettable thing to use. Whether it’s accessing the deep website or any surface web. Anti virus is indeed the only way you protect yourself from viruses. In addition of course only access the website and files that do seem safe and harmless. Whether it’s on the surface web or in the deep web.

So the words about how deep web there are so many viruses and can damage your computer is true, but the same thing also on the surface web.

5. Can get caught the FBI

Provided you do not violate the law, no need to fear will be detected by the FBI for accessing the web. In fact, getting into the deep web or even dark web is not unlawful. But what you do in it that can make you arrested by the authorities.

But again for this, just like when you use surface web where if not careful and do illegal things, also can be arrested. Poker Online

Facebook Tightens Content Control After the Bomb Incident in the UK

As a social network, Facebook is determined to be an enemy to the terrorists. The attack on London Bridge over the weekend reinforced this Facebook determination.

News Techno – As a social network, Facebook is determined to be an enemy to the terrorists. The attack on London Bridge over the weekend reinforced this Facebook determination.

“We want Facebook to be a hostile environment for terrorists,” said Facebook Policy Director Simon Milner, as quoted on Sunday. “If we know an emergency situation that threatens the safety of someone, we convey to law enforcement,” added Milner.

As a form of prevention of acts of terror, Milner promised Facebook would deliver a danger signal to the authorities. He admitted it was trying to aggressively deal with terrorist content on their platform. This is a reaction to Facebook responding to terrorist acts in London that killed seven people.

Pressure from the government – about Facebook Effect’s

But Facebook does not fully act on its own initiative. They are also under pressure from the government to tighten the oversight of agitated content for the benefit of terrorism. British Prime Minister Theresa May for example, he decided to tighten the rules of Internet use. The decision was taken to separate terrorists from digital equipment. Because, they often use this technology to communicate and plan attacks.

May also encouraged the internet and large internet companies not to be the spread of extremist ideology. “We need to work together between democratic governments to reach an international agreement to regulate the virtual world, to counter the spread of extremism and terrorism plans,” he said as quoted by The Register.

For that, May expects internet companies to develop devices to identify and get rid of the malicious material automatically. It is also expected that users can report this malicious content to the authorities and block the users who distribute it. May also calls on international regulators to refer to the European Commission’s plan to allow access to data stored in the cloud on applications that use encryption.

“We should not allow any room for ideology like this to breed, but it’s the responsibility of the internet and big companies that sell internet-based services,” said May.

Contradiction after all events

Google, Apple, Microsoft, Twitter, and Facebook, often the spotlight after the terror act erupted. Because the encryption technology that they apply even become protector of the terrorists. This also prevents law enforcers from capturing terrorist acts.

The closest example is Apple’s dispute with the FBI in the mass shooting case in San Bernardino, California, USA. The dispute occurred in December 2015. At that time Apple rejected the FBI request to open the perpetrator’s iPhone encryption. Do not accept, the FBI took the case to court. However, it all ended when the FBI broke into the perpetrator’s iPhone by hiring a third party.